Match statistics snapshot
- Ferroviária created the clearer chances on xG (1.74 vs 0.94, Δ 0.80).
- Ferroviária fired more attempts (12 vs 9 shots).
- Ferroviária held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 1.74Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.94 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 233 |
| 459Lead | Total passes | 310 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Amazonas |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |