Match statistics snapshot
- Ferroviária created the clearer chances on xG (1.22 vs 0.53, Δ 0.69).
- Ferroviária fired more attempts (20 vs 11 shots).
- Ferroviária held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 1.22Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.53 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 11Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 390Lead | Accurate passes | 329 |
| 450Lead | Total passes | 389 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 7Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |