Match statistics snapshot
- Ferroviária created the clearer chances on xG (1.42 vs 0.28, Δ 1.14).
- Ferroviária fired more attempts (30 vs 3 shots).
- Criciuma was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 23%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 1.42Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.28 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 5 |
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| 12Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 1 |
| 7Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 30Lead | Total shots | 3 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 64%Lead | Ball possession | 36% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 69% |
| 398Lead | Accurate passes | 188 |
| 475Lead | Total passes | 274 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Criciuma |
|---|---|---|
| 19 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.