Match statistics snapshot
- Operario-PR created the clearer chances on xG (1.07 vs 1.60, Δ 0.53).
- Operario-PR fired more attempts (27 vs 7 shots).
- Ferroviária was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 22%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 1.07 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 15Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 27Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 23% | Ball possession | 77%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 88%Lead |
| 112 | Accurate passes | 493Lead |
| 172 | Total passes | 560Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 16Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 13Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ferroviária | Statistic | Operario-pr |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 4 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.