Match statistics snapshot
- Feyenoord created the clearer chances on xG (3.24 vs 0.67, Δ 2.57).
- Feyenoord fired more attempts (21 vs 7 shots).
- Feyenoord was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 29%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 3.24Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 548Lead | Accurate passes | 292 |
| 614Lead | Total passes | 369 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Heerenveen |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.