Match statistics snapshot
- Inter created the clearer chances on xG (0.45 vs 2.25, Δ 1.80).
- Inter fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Feyenoord was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 54%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0.45 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.25Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 11Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 85% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 313 | Accurate passes | 459Lead |
| 368 | Total passes | 513Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5 | Goalkeeper saves | 5 |
| 0.20 | Goals prevented | 0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Feyenoord | Statistic | Inter |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |