Match statistics snapshot
- Ilves created the clearer chances on xG (0.08 vs 4.07, Δ 3.99).
- Ilves fired more attempts (30 vs 3 shots).
- Ilves held more of the ball (64% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 0.08 | Expected goals (xG) | 4.07Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 1 | Shots inside the box | 19Lead |
| 1 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Total shots | 30Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 73% | Pass accuracy | 84%Lead |
| 185 | Accurate passes | 397Lead |
| 254 | Total passes | 471Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Corner kicks | 17Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 13Lead |
| 10Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Ilves |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |