Match statistics snapshot
- FF Jaro created the clearer chances on xG (2.43 vs 2.05, Δ 0.38).
- Mariehamn fired more attempts (16 vs 15 shots).
- FF Jaro held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 2.43Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 7 | Shots on target | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 15 | Total shots | 16Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 469Lead | Accurate passes | 268 |
| 548Lead | Total passes | 326 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 4 |
| 7Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 6 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Mariehamn |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 1 |