Match statistics snapshot
- Turku PS created the clearer chances on xG (1.55 vs 1.60, Δ 0.05).
- Turku PS was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 40%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Turku Ps |
|---|---|---|
| 1.55 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.60Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 5Lead |
| 3 |
| 3 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Turku Ps |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 380Lead | Accurate passes | 274 |
| 443Lead | Total passes | 343 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Turku Ps |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Turku Ps |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Ff Jaro | Statistic | Turku Ps |
|---|---|---|
| 18 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| 0 | Red cards | 0 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |