Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.25 vs 0.78, Δ 0.53).
- Como fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Fiorentina was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 50%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.25 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.78Lead |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 2 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 8Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 356 | Accurate passes | 362Lead |
| 440 | Total passes | 442Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| 0.20 | Goals prevented | 0.20 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 24 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |