Match statistics snapshot
- Como created the clearer chances on xG (0.49 vs 1.25, Δ 0.76).
- Como fired more attempts (19 vs 8 shots).
- Como was more accurate in front of goal (37% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 0.49 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 9Lead |
| 1 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 39% | Ball possession | 61%Lead |
| 77% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 313 | Total passes | 502Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
| -0.56 | Goals prevented | -0.56 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fiorentina | Statistic | Como |
|---|---|---|
| 16Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 3Lead |