Match statistics snapshot
- Plzen created the clearer chances on xG (0.52 vs 2.05, Δ 1.53).
- Plzen fired more attempts (15 vs 11 shots).
- Plzen was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 18%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fk Jablonec | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.52 | Expected goals (xG) | 2.05Lead |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 13Lead |
| 7 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fk Jablonec | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 197 | Accurate passes | 290Lead |
| 303 | Total passes | 393Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fk Jablonec | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fk Jablonec | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fk Jablonec | Statistic | Plzen |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 20 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |