Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fk Košice | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count. | ||
| OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines. | ||
| Shots inside the box | ||
| Shots off target | ||
| Shots on target | ||
| Shots outside the box | ||
| Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target. |
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fk Košice | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| Ball possession | ||
| Pass accuracy | ||
| Accurate passes | ||
| Total passes |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fk Košice | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fk Košice | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced. | ||
| Goalkeeper saves |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fk Košice | Statistic | Žilina |
|---|---|---|
| Fouls | ||
0 | Red cards | 0 |
2Lead | Yellow cards | 3 |
Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.
Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.
Žilina leads this block
Žilina had the edge in 2 of 3 signals in this block.
Žilina leads (6.0 vs 4.0).
Fk Košice leads (7.0 vs 3.0).
Žilina leads (3.0 vs 2.0).
