Match statistics snapshot
- Flamengo created the clearer chances on xG (1.29 vs 0.02, Δ 1.27).
- Flamengo fired more attempts (15 vs 1 shots).
- Ceara was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 27%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Flamengo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 1.29Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.02 |
| Offsides | ||
| 11Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 0 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 1 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Flamengo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 69%Lead | Ball possession | 31% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 668Lead | Accurate passes | 247 |
| 723Lead | Total passes | 310 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Flamengo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Flamengo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -0.67 | Goals prevented | -0.67 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Flamengo | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| Yellow cards |
Statistics is not available yet.