Match statistics snapshot
- Fleetwood Town created the clearer chances on xG (1.87 vs 1.15, Δ 0.72).
- Fleetwood Town was more accurate in front of goal (46% on target vs 23%).
- Shrewsbury held more of the ball (55% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fleetwood Town | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 1.87Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.15 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fleetwood Town | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 45% | Ball possession | 55%Lead |
| 66% | Pass accuracy | 72%Lead |
| 241 | Accurate passes | 318Lead |
| 366 | Total passes | 442Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fleetwood Town | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fleetwood Town | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fleetwood Town | Statistic | Shrewsbury |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |