Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense fired more attempts (26 vs 9 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (35% on target vs 0%).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (67% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 17Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 10 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 26Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 76% |
| 517Lead | Accurate passes | 221 |
| 591Lead | Total passes | 290 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Aparecidense |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 14 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |