Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.11 vs 0.10, Δ 1.01).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (8 vs 5 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 1.11Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.10 |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 1 |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 4Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 67%Lead | Ball possession | 33% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 75% |
| 428Lead | Accurate passes | 177 |
| 489Lead | Total passes | 236 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 1Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Argentinos Jrs |
|---|---|---|
| 14Lead | Fouls | 18 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 6 |