Match statistics snapshot
- Botafogo created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 1.90, Δ 1.02).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (19 vs 13 shots).
- Botafogo was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 26%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.90Lead |
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 13Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 19Lead | Total shots | 13 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 66%Lead | Ball possession | 34% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 78% |
| 540Lead | Accurate passes | 237 |
| 612Lead | Total passes | 304 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Corner kicks | 2 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Botafogo |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 14Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |