Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.03 vs 0.18, Δ 0.85).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (12 vs 6 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 1.03Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.18 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6 |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 5Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 12Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 59%Lead | Ball possession | 41% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 453Lead | Accurate passes | 298 |
| 527Lead | Total passes | 365 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 1Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| -0.33 | Goals prevented | -0.33 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Ceara |
|---|---|---|
| 17 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |