Match statistics snapshot
- Cerro Porteno fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 23%).
- Cerro Porteno held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 0Lead | Offsides | 1 |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 1 | Shots off target | 5Lead |
| Shots on target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 70% | Pass accuracy | 82%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 304 | Total passes | 497Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 9Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 10 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.