Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.02 vs 0.67, Δ 0.35).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (74% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 1.02Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.67 |
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 17Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 74%Lead | Ball possession | 26% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 68% |
| 570Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 618Lead | Total passes | 221 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 0 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.16 | Goals prevented | 0.16 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cerro Porteno |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.