Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (2.47 vs 0.41, Δ 2.06).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (30 vs 8 shots).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (71% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 2.47Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.41 |
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 12Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 6 |
|---|
| 30Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 71%Lead | Ball possession | 29% |
| 93%Lead | Pass accuracy | 79% |
| 688Lead | Accurate passes | 241 |
| 740Lead | Total passes | 305 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
| 0.48 | Goals prevented | 0.48 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Chapecoense-sc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.