Match statistics snapshot
- Colo Colo created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 1.11, Δ 0.54).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (9 vs 7 shots).
- Colo Colo was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 33%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.57 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.11Lead |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 6Lead |
| 3Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Total shots | 7 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 88%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 406Lead | Accurate passes | 362 |
| 464Lead | Total passes | 426 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 4Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Colo Colo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 15 |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |