Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.63 vs 0.91, Δ 0.72).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (21 vs 16 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (38% on target vs 19%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 1.63Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.91 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 15Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 6 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 21Lead | Total shots | 16 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 90%Lead | Pass accuracy | 80% |
| 547Lead | Accurate passes | 252 |
| 609Lead | Total passes | 316 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 5 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 5 | Blocked shots | 5 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Coritiba |
|---|---|---|
| 15 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 2 |