Match statistics snapshot
- Cuiaba created the clearer chances on xG (0.91 vs 0.92, Δ 0.01).
- Cuiaba fired more attempts (13 vs 7 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (29% on target vs 15%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 0.91 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.92Lead |
| 0Lead | Offsides | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 87%Lead | Pass accuracy | 85% |
| 562Lead | Accurate passes | 334 |
| 643Lead | Total passes | 391 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 0 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Cuiaba |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 10Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |