Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 0.46, Δ 1.02).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (16 vs 8 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.46 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 14Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 8Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 54%Lead | Ball possession | 46% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 374Lead | Accurate passes | 317 |
| 448Lead | Total passes | 392 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 3Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 9Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Flamengo |
|---|---|---|
| 25 | Fouls | 20Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 7 | Yellow cards | 5Lead |