Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (2.25 vs 1.58, Δ 0.67).
- Gremio fired more attempts (12 vs 10 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 25%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 2.25Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.58 |
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 3Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 85%Lead | Pass accuracy | 82% |
| 415Lead | Accurate passes | 367 |
| 490Lead | Total passes | 448 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 6Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
| 0.60 | Goals prevented | 0.60 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Gremio |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 13 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |
Statistics is not available yet.