Fluminense vs Operario-PR Match Statistics & xG

Fluminense vs Operario-PR match statistics

xG, possession, shots, and full match statistics for Fluminense vs Operario-PR in Copa Do Brasil.

Match statistics snapshot

Home fired more attempts (22 vs 13 shots).

FluminensevsOperario-PR

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.
1	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	1
14Lead	Shots inside the box	5

10Lead	Shots off target	5
8Lead	Shots on target	5

8	Shots outside the box	8
22Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	13

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
52%Lead	Ball possession	48%
90%Lead	Pass accuracy	87%
458Lead	Accurate passes	409
510Lead	Total passes	472

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
5Lead	Corner kicks	1

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
4Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	3
4	Goalkeeper saves	7Lead
	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
24	Fouls	16Lead
0Lead	Red cards	1
3Lead	Yellow cards	5

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home leads box penetration (+65% vs Away)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home36%49% share
Away38%51% share
Away leads (38% vs 36%).
2
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home64%62% share
Away38%38% share
Home leads box penetration (+65% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

1
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home2339% share
Away3661% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+137% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home4570% share
Away1930% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+137% vs Away)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Home leads this block

3Home

duels won

1Away

Home had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home30.049% share
Away31.051% share
Away leads (31.0 vs 30.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home46.853% share
Away41.847% share
Home leads (46.8 vs 41.8).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home19.076% share
Away6.024% share
Home leads (19.0 vs 6.0).
4
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home31.053% share
Away27.047% share
Home leads (31.0 vs 27.0).

FluminensevsOperario-PR

Attacking

Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.

Home	Statistic	Away
	Expected goals (xG)Quality of chances created — not just shot count.
1	OffsidesTiming of runs — high counts can mean aggressive lines.	1
14Lead	Shots inside the box	5

10Lead	Shots off target	5
8Lead	Shots on target	5

8	Shots outside the box	8
22Lead	Total shotsAll attempts including blocked and off-target.	13

Possession & passing

How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.

Home	Statistic	Away
52%Lead	Ball possession	48%
90%Lead	Pass accuracy	87%
458Lead	Accurate passes	409
510Lead	Total passes	472

Set pieces

Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.

Home	Statistic	Away
5Lead	Corner kicks	1

Defensive & goalkeeping

Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.

Home	Statistic	Away
4Lead	Blocked shotsDefensive actions — also counts as part of attacking pressure faced.	3
4	Goalkeeper saves	7Lead
	Goals preventedKeeper performance vs expected — positive is above average.

Discipline

Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.

Home	Statistic	Away
24	Fouls	16Lead
0Lead	Red cards	1
3Lead	Yellow cards	5

Tactical insights

Scouting-style duels — each row compares both teams, shows share of the pie, and who had the edge. Categories summarize who won more signals.

Shooting efficiency

How clinical and dangerous each attack was — not just how often they shot, but where and how good those chances were.

1Home

duels won

1Away

Home leads box penetration (+65% vs Away)

1
Shot accuracy
Share of attempts that tested the goalkeeper — accuracy vs volume.
Home36%49% share
Away38%51% share
Away leads (38% vs 36%).
2
Inside box ratio
How often attacks reached the penalty area — proxy for box penetration.
Home64%62% share
Away38%38% share
Home leads box penetration (+65% vs Away)

Tactical identity

Playing style signals: whether chances came from patient possession or direct vertical play.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

1
Passes per shot
Build-up length before shooting. Higher = more patient circulation; lower = direct vertical play.
Home2339% share
Away3661% share
Away — slower buildup (more passes per shot)

Pressure & control

Territorial dominance built from box presence, set pieces, and sustained threat.

Home leads this block

1Home

duels won

0Away

Home leads territorial pressure (+137% vs Away)

1
Attack pressure score
Weighted territorial score: in-box shots (×2) + corners + on-target efforts + blocks forced.
Home4570% share
Away1930% share
Home leads territorial pressure (+137% vs Away)

Gameplay profile

Archetype ratings you can map to card modifiers, AI behaviour, or match narratives.

Home leads this block

3Home

duels won

1Away

Home had the edge in 3 of 4 signals in this block.

1
Aggression rating
Fouls and cards combined — physical intensity and risk.
Home30.049% share
Away31.051% share
Away leads (31.0 vs 30.0).
2
Control rating
Possession blended with pass accuracy — control without chaos.
Home46.853% share
Away41.847% share
Home leads (46.8 vs 41.8).
3
Siege pressure
Corners plus in-box shots — sustained pressure around the box.
Home19.076% share
Away6.024% share
Home leads (19.0 vs 6.0).
4
Chaos factor
Fouls, cards, and blocks — how stop-start and disruptive the match felt.
Home31.053% share
Away27.047% share
Home leads (31.0 vs 27.0).

Fluminense vs Operario-PR Match Statistics & xG | Sportra

Fluminense vs Operario-PR Match Statistics & xG

Fluminense vs Operario-PR match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Fluminense vs Operario-PR match statistics

Match statistics snapshot

Shot accuracy

Inside box ratio

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Chaos factor

Shot accuracy

Inside box ratio

Passes per shot

Attack pressure score

Aggression rating

Control rating

Siege pressure

Chaos factor