Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.06 vs 0.58, Δ 0.48).
- RB Bragantino fired more attempts (15 vs 12 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (33% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Rb Bragantino |
|---|---|---|
| 1.06Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.58 |
| 2 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 8Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 5 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 12 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Rb Bragantino |
|---|---|---|
| 51%Lead | Ball possession | 49% |
| 82%Lead | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 345Lead | Accurate passes | 320 |
| 420Lead | Total passes | 397 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Rb Bragantino |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 6 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Rb Bragantino |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 4Lead |
| 3Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Rb Bragantino |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 5 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.