Fluminense 2-1 Remo
Key events
View all
Remo- J. Silva
- Hulk
- K. Serna
FluminenseFT 2–1
Predictions & odds
View allModel outlook versus market-implied chances (overround removed from decimal odds). For entertainment and analysis only — not betting advice.
Estimated outcome
Estimated outcome mix from Sportra's pre-match model
- Fluminense50.2%
- Draw24.3%
- Remo25.5%
Prematch market
Source: William Hill
- Fluminense63.9%
- Draw21.9%
- Remo14.2%
Venue
Estadio Jornalista Mário Filho (Maracanã)
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro · Brazil
- Address
- Rua Professor Eurico Rabelo, Maracanã
- Surface
- grass
- Capacity
- 78838
Match
Joao Vitor Gobi, Brazil
Round 24
- Referee
- Joao Vitor Gobi, Brazil
- Round
- 24
- Date
Competition
League · Brazil
- Country
- Brazil (BR)
- Season
- 2026
- Dates
- 2026-01-28 → 2026-12-02
Match statistics
View allKey metrics
Visual snapshot of possession, chance quality, and shooting.
Possession
76%76%24%24%
Expected goals (xG)
0.5774%0.2026%
Total shots
1387%213%
Shots on target
583%117%
Team form & competition
View all
- #4 Position
- 57 Points
- 16-9-9 W-D-L
- 55/42 Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-0 / 1-3
- Worst defeats
- 1-2 / 3-1
- #19 Position
- 29 Points
- 6-11-17 W-D-L
- 37/57 Goals F/A
- Best wins
- 4-1 / 2-3
- Worst defeats
- 0-2 / 3-0
Head to head
View all1Fluminensewins
0Drawsmatches
0Remowins
Recorded meetings: 1 (available previous meetings, not necessarily all-time).
- Highest scoring
- Remo 0–2 Fluminense
- Fluminense most goals
- Remo 0–2 Fluminense
- Remo most goals
- Remo 0–2 Fluminense
Recent meetings
Match headlines
/https%3A%2F%2Fsportsmole-media-prod.s3.gra.io.cloud.ovh.net%2Fuploads%2F2026%2F04%2Fimago1075343000-2-69f27ab6b544a066646610.jpg)
Headlines link to a short summary; the full story is on the original publisher’s site.
Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (0.57 vs 0.20, Δ 0.37). Fluminense fired more attempts (13 vs 2 shots). Remo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 38%). Fluminense held more of the ball (76% possession).
Fluminense outperformed their xG by 1.4 goals (2 scored vs 0.57 xG). Remo outperformed their xG by 0.8 goals (1 scored vs 0.20 xG).