Match statistics snapshot
- Sao Paulo created the clearer chances on xG (0.46 vs 0.83, Δ 0.37).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (15 vs 10 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 0.46 | Expected goals (xG) | 0.83Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 6 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 15Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 44% | Ball possession | 56%Lead |
| 87% | Pass accuracy | 89%Lead |
| 365 | Accurate passes | 454Lead |
| 420 | Total passes | 511Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 7Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| -1.07 | Goals prevented | -1.07 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 13Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 4 |
Statistics is not available yet.