Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.48 vs 1.01, Δ 0.47).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (14 vs 10 shots).
- Sao Paulo was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 30%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.48Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 1.01 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 6Lead |
|---|
| 10 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 50% | Ball possession | 50% |
| 83% | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 394Lead | Accurate passes | 387 |
| 473Lead | Total passes | 469 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.34 | Goals prevented | 0.34 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |