Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (43% on target vs 22%).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (61% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 8Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 61%Lead | Ball possession | 39% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 77% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 249 |
| 499Lead | Total passes | 323 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Sporting Cristal |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 2Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.