Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense fired more attempts (27 vs 2 shots).
- The Strongest was more accurate in front of goal (100% on target vs 41%).
- Fluminense held more of the ball (77% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 7 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 21Lead | Shots inside the box | 0 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 0 |
| 11Lead | Shots on target | 2 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 27Lead | Total shots | 2 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 77%Lead | Ball possession | 23% |
| 92%Lead | Pass accuracy | 67% |
| 677Lead | Accurate passes | 151 |
| 735Lead | Total passes | 226 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 10Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 10Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | The Strongest |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Fouls | 11 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 1 |