Match statistics snapshot
- Fluminense created the clearer chances on xG (1.83 vs 0.71, Δ 1.12).
- Fluminense fired more attempts (23 vs 8 shots).
- Fluminense was more accurate in front of goal (39% on target vs 13%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 1.83Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.71 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 9Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 23Lead | Total shots | 8 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 79%Lead | Ball possession | 21% |
| 89%Lead | Pass accuracy | 60% |
| 653Lead | Accurate passes | 114 |
| 732Lead | Total passes | 190 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 8Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fluminense | Statistic | Vasco Da Gama |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 19 |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |