Match statistics snapshot
- Crawley Town fired more attempts (13 vs 8 shots).
- Forest Green was more accurate in front of goal (63% on target vs 46%).
- Crawley Town held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 1Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 5 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 3Lead |
|---|
| 8 | Total shots | 13Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 38% | Ball possession | 62%Lead |
| 65% | Pass accuracy | 76%Lead |
| 212 | Accurate passes | 407Lead |
| 326 | Total passes | 538Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Crawley Town |
|---|---|---|
| 16 | Fouls | 4Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 4 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.