Match statistics snapshot
- Forest Green was more accurate in front of goal (36% on target vs 27%).
- Gillingham held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 2 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 3 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 4Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 7Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 40% | Ball possession | 60%Lead |
| 58% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 179 | Accurate passes | 333Lead |
| 308 | Total passes | 452Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 4Lead |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Gillingham |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.