Match statistics snapshot
- Morecambe fired more attempts (14 vs 13 shots).
- Morecambe was more accurate in front of goal (79% on target vs 15%).
- Forest Green held more of the ball (60% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| Offsides | ||
| 9 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 4Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 3 |
| 2 | Shots on target | 11Lead |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 13 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 60%Lead | Ball possession | 40% |
| 79%Lead | Pass accuracy | 72% |
| 421Lead | Accurate passes | 260 |
| 536Lead | Total passes | 359 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 7 | Corner kicks | 7 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 9Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Morecambe |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |