Match statistics snapshot
- Walsall fired more attempts (17 vs 5 shots).
- Forest Green was more accurate in front of goal (60% on target vs 24%).
- Walsall held more of the ball (58% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 4 | Shots inside the box | 12Lead |
| 2 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 7Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 4Lead |
|---|
| 1 | Shots outside the box | 5Lead |
|---|
| 5 | Total shots | 17Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 42% | Ball possession | 58%Lead |
| 68% | Pass accuracy | 74%Lead |
| 204 | Accurate passes | 289Lead |
| 298 | Total passes | 391Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 6Lead |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forest Green | Statistic | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| 14 | Fouls | 7Lead |
| 0Lead | Red cards | 1 |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |