Match statistics snapshot
- Forge fired more attempts (14 vs 12 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 29%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (57% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 8 | Shots inside the box | 8 |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 4 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 43% | Ball possession | 57%Lead |
| 82% | Pass accuracy | 87%Lead |
| 331 | Accurate passes | 461Lead |
| 403 | Total passes | 532Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 3Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 3 |
| 4Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3 | Yellow cards | 3 |