Match statistics snapshot
- Forge fired more attempts (16 vs 10 shots).
- Cavalry FC was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 31%).
- Forge held more of the ball (62% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 9Lead |
| 5Lead |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 5 | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 9Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 10 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 62%Lead | Ball possession | 38% |
| 84%Lead | Pass accuracy | 70% |
| 400Lead | Accurate passes | 218 |
| 479Lead | Total passes | 311 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 8Lead | Corner kicks | 1 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 1 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 5Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 13 | Fouls | 6Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |