Match statistics snapshot
- Cavalry FC fired more attempts (24 vs 7 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (57% on target vs 25%).
- Cavalry FC held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 2 | Offsides | 2 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 15Lead |
| 2 |
| 9Lead |
| 4 | Shots on target | 6Lead |
|---|
| 2 | Shots outside the box | 9Lead |
|---|
| 7 | Total shots | 24Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 47% | Ball possession | 53%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 80%Lead |
| 297 | Accurate passes | 334Lead |
| 377 | Total passes | 417Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 8Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 9Lead |
| 6Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12 | Fouls | 12 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |