Match statistics snapshot
- Forge created the clearer chances on xG (1.50 vs 0.47, Δ 1.03).
- Forge fired more attempts (15 vs 6 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (40% on target vs 0%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1.50Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.47 |
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 5 |
| 8 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 0 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 15Lead | Total shots | 6 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 36% | Ball possession | 64%Lead |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 214 | Accurate passes | 426Lead |
| 274 | Total passes | 493Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 4Lead | Corner kicks | 3 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 0 | Goalkeeper saves | 6Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Cavalry Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 12Lead | Fouls | 17 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3 | Yellow cards | 2Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.