Match statistics snapshot
- Monterrey fired more attempts (19 vs 6 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (50% on target vs 37%).
- Forge held more of the ball (53% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Monterrey |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 6 | Offsides | 0Lead |
| 3 | Shots inside the box | 8Lead |
| 3 |
| 10Lead |
| 3 | Shots on target | 7Lead |
|---|
| 3 | Shots outside the box | 11Lead |
|---|
| 6 | Total shots | 19Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Monterrey |
|---|---|---|
| 53%Lead | Ball possession | 47% |
| 78% | Pass accuracy | 79%Lead |
| 385Lead | Accurate passes | 343 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 432 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Monterrey |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Monterrey |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Blocked shots | 2Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Monterrey |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 9 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |