Match statistics snapshot
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (45% on target vs 27%).
- Pacific FC held more of the ball (59% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 7Lead | Shots inside the box | 3 |
| 4 | Shots off target |
| 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 3 |
|---|
| 4 | Shots outside the box | 8Lead |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 11 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 41% | Ball possession | 59%Lead |
| 76% | Pass accuracy | 83%Lead |
| 257 | Accurate passes | 406Lead |
| 340 | Total passes | 488Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 3Lead |
| 2 | Goalkeeper saves | 2 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | Fouls | 8Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 2 | Yellow cards | 1Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.