Match statistics snapshot
- Pacific FC fired more attempts (14 vs 11 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (55% on target vs 36%).
- Pacific FC held more of the ball (54% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 5 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 3 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 4Lead |
| 6Lead | Shots on target | 5 |
|---|
| 6Lead | Shots outside the box | 4 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 14Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 46% | Ball possession | 54%Lead |
| 79% | Pass accuracy | 85%Lead |
| 320 | Accurate passes | 403Lead |
| 407 | Total passes | 476Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | Corner kicks | 7Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 5Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 4 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 7Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| Red cards | ||
| 0Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |