Match statistics snapshot
- Forge fired more attempts (16 vs 5 shots).
- Forge was more accurate in front of goal (31% on target vs 20%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 1 | Offsides | 1 |
| 9Lead | Shots inside the box | 4 |
| 6Lead | Shots off target |
| 5Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 7Lead | Shots outside the box | 1 |
|---|
| 16Lead | Total shots | 5 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 52%Lead | Ball possession | 48% |
| 86%Lead | Pass accuracy | 83% |
| 422Lead | Accurate passes | 371 |
| 493Lead | Total passes | 448 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 5Lead | Blocked shots | 0 |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 3Lead |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Pacific Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11Lead | Fouls | 12 |
| Red cards | ||
| 1Lead | Yellow cards | 2 |
Statistics is not available yet.