Match statistics snapshot
- Forge fired more attempts (20 vs 12 shots).
- Vancouver FC was more accurate in front of goal (42% on target vs 15%).
- Forge held more of the ball (65% possession).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Forge | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| Expected goals (xG) | ||
| 3 | Offsides | 2Lead |
| 12Lead | Shots inside the box | 7 |
| 11 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 5 |
| 3 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 8Lead | Shots outside the box | 5 |
|---|
| 20Lead | Total shots | 12 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Forge | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 65%Lead | Ball possession | 35% |
| 83%Lead | Pass accuracy | 71% |
| 450Lead | Accurate passes | 210 |
| 542Lead | Total passes | 294 |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Forge | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 9Lead | Corner kicks | 4 |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Forge | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 3 | Goalkeeper saves | 3 |
| Goals prevented |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Forge | Statistic | Vancouver Fc |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 9Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 5 |
Statistics is not available yet.