Match statistics snapshot
- Fortaleza EC created the clearer chances on xG (1.33 vs 0.61, Δ 0.72).
- Sao Paulo fired more attempts (12 vs 11 shots).
- Fortaleza EC was more accurate in front of goal (18% on target vs 8%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fortaleza Ec | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 1.33Lead | Expected goals (xG) | 0.61 |
| 2Lead | Offsides | 3 |
| 7 | Shots inside the box | 10Lead |
| 5 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 6Lead |
| 2Lead | Shots on target | 1 |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 2 |
|---|
| 11 | Total shots | 12Lead |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fortaleza Ec | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 37% | Ball possession | 63%Lead |
| 74% | Pass accuracy | 86%Lead |
| 208 | Accurate passes | 417Lead |
| 280 | Total passes | 486Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fortaleza Ec | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 3 | Corner kicks | 10Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fortaleza Ec | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Blocked shots | 5Lead |
| 1 | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| -0.10 | Goals prevented | -0.10 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fortaleza Ec | Statistic | Sao Paulo |
|---|---|---|
| 15Lead | Fouls | 16 |
| 1 | Red cards | 0Lead |
| 3Lead | Yellow cards | 4 |