Match statistics snapshot
- NEC Nijmegen created the clearer chances on xG (0.88 vs 1.25, Δ 0.37).
- Fortuna Sittard fired more attempts (14 vs 9 shots).
- NEC Nijmegen was more accurate in front of goal (56% on target vs 7%).
Shot volume, box entries, and chance quality — who threatened the goal more.
| Fortuna Sittard | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 0.88 | Expected goals (xG) | 1.25Lead |
| Offsides | ||
| 10Lead | Shots inside the box | 6 |
| Shots off target |
|---|
| 2 |
| 1 | Shots on target | 5Lead |
|---|
| 4Lead | Shots outside the box | 3 |
|---|
| 14Lead | Total shots | 9 |
|---|
How each side moved the ball and shared control of the match.
| Fortuna Sittard | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 49% | Ball possession | 51%Lead |
| 81% | Pass accuracy | 81% |
| 369 | Accurate passes | 383Lead |
| 456 | Total passes | 472Lead |
Dead-ball situations that can swing momentum and territory.
| Fortuna Sittard | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 4 | Corner kicks | 5Lead |
Blocks, saves, and how much danger was actually allowed.
| Fortuna Sittard | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 6Lead | Blocked shots | 2 |
| 2Lead | Goalkeeper saves | 1 |
| 0.15 | Goals prevented | 0.15 |
Physical intensity and referee involvement — fouls and cards.
| Fortuna Sittard | Statistic | Nec Nijmegen |
|---|---|---|
| 11 | Fouls | 5Lead |
| Red cards | ||
| 1 | Yellow cards | 0Lead |
Statistics is not available yet.